Sunday, January 25, 2015

The Pegida Rally

A young blonde woman sits in front of the camera, can of hairspray in hand.
Over the next few minutes she proceeds to lacquer her hair, scraping it back forcefully so her forehead takes prominence. She then applies heavy black eyeliner, chatting away in German all the while.
Finally – and I actually gasped when this happened – she takes a pink disposable razor and shaves off her eyebrows, before pretending to tattoo two thin black lines in their place.
This YouTube video, published this week by channel Interview in the Box, has already been watched by more than half a million people.
Called ‘Pegida Make-Up Tutorial’ it promises that you can: ‘Become a real Pegida Girl in less than five minutes: With a few simple tricks you are the star of the next Monday demo!’
The ‘look’ it’s satirising is that of Kathrin Oertel. The 37-year-old ‘business consultant’ has just become the feminine face of Germany’s Pegida anti-Islam movement, following the resignation of its founder Lutz Bachmann after a selfie emerged of him dressed as Hitler.
It’s quite a sea change for the far-right movement that emerged in Dresden last October and has been gathering momentum ever since.
Pegida stands for Patriotische Europäer Gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes (Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West). The group has been holding weekly rallies, which have spread rapidly across Germany.
In Dresden, a reported 25,000 people now gather weekly to chant slogans such as ‘Wir sind das Volk’ (We are the people) and ‘Lugen presse’ meaning ‘lying press’ – a term first used by the Nazis and adopted by anti-communist demonstrators in East Germany during the 1980s.
(And, it’s worth saying that the number of counter-demonstrators far outnumber Pegida themselves).

Protestors against Pegida stand with a caricature of Kathrin Oertel. (Photo: Reuters)
Flags read “We want our homeland back”. Demonstrators voice concerns that Germany is being taken over by immigrants. In 2014, the country took in record numbers of asylum seekers - 200,000 largely from Syria and Iraq – more than any other country in Europe.
Hard-working, affluent Germans rub shoulders with known neo-Nazis and notorious gangs of football hooligans. Supporters are asked to abstain from drinking alcohol and to protest ‘peacefully’.
Men far outnumber women. Indeed, the first academic study of the movement, by the Dresden Technical University, found that 75 per cent of all attendees at Pegida marches are male, white, middle-class and have an average age of 48.
This is where Oertel comes in. This thin, pale, blonde and camera-ready – though she’s often referred to on social media as ‘Cruella de Vil’ - was already well-known as Pegida’s spokesperson. With the departure of Bachmann, she has been pushed into the limelight.
And it seems the Pegida marketing machine doesn’t intend to miss the chance to soften its hard edges.
Because Oertel brings Pegida something just by the simple fact of being a woman. Most Germans see it as a movement of angry men. To have a woman as its public face presents them with the potential to broaden its public appeal.
“I am a woman of the people,” Oertel told a recent crowd. I have three children”.
A scence from the spoof 'Pegida girl' makeover video on YouTube
On Monday, at Pegida's first press conference, after the cancellation of its weekly demonstration - following threats made against Bachmann - she insisted "we're just normal people", adding “we cannot live with being called ‘Islam-haters”.
Certainly, Oertel appears a rather safe option in comparison to Bachmann. Long before the Hitler photograph (which she defended as “satire”), the Telegraph’s Berlin correspondent Justin Huggler tells me, the former Pegida chief was mired in controversy over his past criminal record (burglary and drug offences) and allegations that he’d been deported from South Africa.
We really know very little about Oertel. She’s notoriously private and, other than a number of controlled TV appearances, doesn’t court the media (at the time of going to press, even her Wikipedia page read ‘This article has been proposed for deletion’). Her political affiliations aside (and the fact she’s divorced - hardly scandalous), there appears to be nothing controversial about her. Supporters are calling her the 'clean wife of Pegida'.
Says Huggler: “She's the modern German woman: professional, divorced mother-of-three, respectable. She went on TV on a political talk show, and did okay against the seasoned politicians. She didn't come out on top, but she didn't make a fool of herself either, and she was up against people who do this for a living.”
So can this ‘modern German woman’ bring Pegida the respectability they so desperately crave? You don’t have to look far on social media to find commenters denouncing them as ‘Nazis’ and writing that the German people are embarrassed by their existence.
“Women tend to add softness,” historian Guy Walters tells me.
“The perception is that they are much nicer than men. We instinctively think they can’t be that bad.
“Historically the presence of women has made political movements more palatable and easier to swallow.
“But there’s no reason that women can’t be bigoted arseholes like men. To many, Thatcher proved that and was as ruthless as any man”.
Bachmann and Oertel
To compare Oertel to Thatcher would, of course, be far-fetched. Indeed, in public she and the dozen other Pegida leaders insist they’re not interested in entering politics.
Huggler isn’t so sure. He tells me that this week Oertel phoned a local leader of Germany's rising Eurosceptic party for advice over what to do about the crisis over the Hitler photos - suggesting she may want to be more of a political operator than she lets on.
That – and the image of the ‘normal German woman’ that Oertel seems to be so keen on cultivating – could position her even more in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s firing line.
On New Year’s Eve, in a televised address, she warned German citizens to refrain from attending further ‘unpleasant’ protests – referring to Pegida without explicitly naming them.
“I say to all those who go to such demonstrations: do not follow those who have called the rallies, because all too often they have prejudice, a chilliness, even hatred in their hearts,” she said.
Merkel has accused them of “prejudice, coldness, even hatred in their hearts”.
But on Monday she came to their defence, saying “As Chancellor, I have an interest that demonstrations can take place anywhere in Germany, because it is a fundamental right.
“Such a great good must be protected as far as possible.”
At Pegida rallies, though, Merkel is a hate figure. The research into the movement showed that despite it’s ‘anti-Islamic’ label, Pegida protestors are largely motivated by anti-political establishment feelings. (Although some are there to campaign against battery-farmed chickens, while others call for the TV license to be scrapped).
Of course, Oertel could be accused of trespassing on Merkel’s territory. The Chancellor’s image is that of the normal German woman. She shops in Berlin supermarkets and has been pictured queuing at the tills to pay, alongside other customers.
Many Germans still affectionately call her ‘Mutti’ – or ‘mother’. Although at Pegida rallies, you’re more likely to hear her referred to as ‘Mutti Multi-Kulti’ (‘Mummy Multicultural’).
Oertel’s far right wing leanings are, however, unlikely to do Merkel – who has been accused of being further to the right of centre than she’d like to admit – any harm.
It remains to be seen whether the new face of Pegida can add a veneer of respectability to the movement and whether Angela Merkel can stem the tide of Germans, even modest, swarming to its Monday night marches.
“It remains to be seen whether she has Merkel's famous killer instinct behind the mask,” says Huggler.
And it remains to be seen how Merkel handles this fledgling political movement without isolating the voters who uphold her as ‘Mutti’. For now.

HIjab Lawsuit? 1rst Amendment?

DETROIT — A Muslim woman has filed a lawsuit accusing police of violating her constitutional rights by making her remove her headscarf after they arrested her for driving on a suspended license.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court here, asks for the Dearborn Heights, Mich., Police Department to modify its present policy so a Muslim woman can wear her hijab during booking procedures.
In July, police pulled over Malak Kazan, now 27, of Dearborn Heights on a traffic violation. She then was taken into custody on a traffic misdemeanor because of her suspended license, according to the lawsuit.
The male police officer asked Kazan to remove her headscarf to take her booking photo, which usually requires no head coverings or hats. Kazan objected, saying her faith requires her to cover her hair and neck in the presence of men who are not part of her immediate family, the lawsuit said.
For Kazan, "wearing a headscarf is a reminder of her faith, the importance of modesty in her religion ... as well as a symbol of her own control over who may see the more intimate parts of her body," the suit said. "To have her hair and neck uncovered in public ... is ... deeply humiliating, violating, and defiling experience."
Kazan said she asked to have a female officer take her photo, which the male officer refused to do, the lawsuit said. The officer talked to a supervisor, who told him to proceed as usual.
"It was such an uncomfortable feeling," Kazan told The Arab American News, a national newspaper based in Dearborn, Mich. "I've worn my scarf for 12 years and my religion says that I can't take it off. It's not just a religious issue; this is a part of me. It's my culture, my life and my identity."
The lawsuit maintains that wearing hijab is rooted in Islam, "based on ... the Koran, the primary holy book of the Muslim religion; the hadith, oral traditions coming from the era of the Prophet Mohamed. ... The word hijab comes from the Arabic word hajaba, which means to hide or screen from view or to cover."
hijab, which covers the head and neck but leaves the face clear, is one of several types of headscarves that Muslim women can employ if they wish to use a veil.
The lawsuit was filed against the city of Dearborn Heights, its police department and police chief, saying that Kazan's constitutional rights to free expression of religion were violated. It claims that her rights under the 1st, 4th, and 14th amendments were violated.
Dearborn Heights Mayor Dan Paletko and Dearborn Heights Police Chief Lee Gavin did not return calls and messages seeking comment.
Fewer than 1% of adults in the USA say they are Muslim, according to the Pew Research Religion & Public Life Project, most recently updated in 2011.
Dearborn Heights and neighboring Dearborn have a significant Muslim minority population that is reflected in two Dearborn mosques: The Islamic Center of America, a Shia mosque that is the largest mosque in USA, and Dearborn Mosque, a Sunni mosque that was the second mosque built in this country.
The lawsuit is the latest filed in recent months involving Arab-American Muslim residents in Dearborn Heights who say that police and school officials are biased. Last year, the Crestwood School District in Dearborn Heights reached a settlment with the Department of Justice over concerns that it discriminated against Arab Americans.

Colorado Woman Sentenced for Isis Crimes

Shannon Maureen Conley, a young Colorado woman who tried to join the Islamic State terrorist group,  was sentenced to 48 months in prison Friday by a federal judge determined to send a warning to anyone who was similarly inclined.
“This is not a serious offense but an extremely serious offense. I need to send a message,” U.S. District Judge Raymond P. Moore said as he pronounced the sentence the prosecution had requested. The 48 months will be followed by three years of supervised release.
Conley, 19, pleaded guilty in September to one count of conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization and, in exchange for a lighter sentence, had agreed to help authorities identify and prosecute those trying to recruit others into terrorist groups. The maximum sentence she faced was five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
“I never meant to hurt anyone,” Conley told the judge before he pronounced sentence. Wearing baggy, striped prison garb and a traditional Muslim head scarf, she spoke quickly but her voice broke frequently and she seemed close to collapse.
Conley was arrested in April at Denver International Airport as she tried to board a plane with a one-way ticket to Turkey. She planned to cross into Syria and meet Yousr Mouelhi, a 32-year-old Tunisian Islamic State militant she met on the Internet who had encouraged her to come and had promised marriage.
She said Friday that as she made her plans she did not know of the slaughter and other atrocities that occurred at the hands of the Islamic State militants. She said she is now “horrified” and thanked the FBI for intervening because she believes it saved her life.
“I am glad that I learned the true identity of ISIS here and not on the front lines of Syria,” she told the judge, using an acronym for Islamic State, in front of a packed federal courtroom in Denver.
Moore called her naive and scolded her for loving a “dangerous man” she did not really know. But he said it did not excuse her crime nor her earlier threats of waging violent jihad against the United States.
Conley has been described as a bright but lonely young woman living with her parents in the Denver suburb of Arvada. She converted to Islam about three years ago and became increasingly radicalized through social media and by contacts on the Internet, court documents said.
As she came to the attention of authorities, federal agents tried repeatedly to dissuade her from her plans but Conley was resolved to use the nurse’s training she had received in Colorado to help in what she believed to be a holy war in Syria. She joined Young Explorers, an organization loosely affiliated with the U.S. Army and the Boys Scouts of America, to learn basic military tactics so she could help Islamic State combatants, court documents said.
Her parents became alarmed as they realized how extreme their daughter’s beliefs were. When her father found the airline ticket, bought by her Internet suitor, he called authorities.
Assistant U.S. Atty. Gregory Holloway argued at the sentencing hearing that Conley had been defiant with agents despite their efforts -- as well as her parents’ pleas  -- to talk her out of her plan. “The defendant forced us to arrest her,” he said.
While Holloway acknowledged Conley was cooperative and has disavowed violent jihad, he was concerned that a minimal sentence would not be enough of a deterrent.  He added that she remained defiant toward authority. “I expected far more contrition,” he told the court.
Federal public defender Robert Pepin, however, asked the judge to consider a sentence of one year and one day – which would mean she would be released in just over three months, because she has already been incarcerated for nine months.
He described Conley as easily influenced by others but not dangerous, and argued that a long sentence was unnecessary.  “She has been punished in aces,” he said.
After her guilty plea in September, Pepin called her a “woman of faith” who made bad choices and was led “terribly astray.”
The judge called Conley “a bit of a mess” who needed mental health treatment. And while he said the case was “sad,” he repeatedly wondered aloud: “Does she get it?”
 The Conley case was one of the first to put a name and a face to the troubling trend of young Western Muslim girls and women being recruited into terrorist organizations with a promise of marriage.
About 150 Americans have traveled or attempted to travel to join forces with foreign terrorist groups, a U.S. intelligence official told The Times on Thursday. It was not disclosed how many were women or girls.
Five months after Conley’s arrest, three other suburban Denver teenage girls  -- a 16-year-old  of Sudanese descent and two sisters, 15 and 17, of Somali descent -- were stopped in Germany as they attempted to travel to Syria, where it is believed they also intended to marry Islamic State militants.
The girls, who have not been named, were not charged and were returned to their parents, who reported them missing Oct. 17 along with their passports and about $2,000.  Authorities said the girls, like Conley, had been lured over the Internet and had been planning their journey for months.
Authorities said they believe the recruiter who communicated with one of the girls was the same person who encouraged Douglas McAuthur McCain, 33, to leave Minnesota and go to Syria to take up arms with Islamic State. McCain, who was killed in battle in late August, is thought to be the first U.S. citizen to die while fighting for the terrorist organization. His high school classmate Troy Kastigar was killed in 2009 fighting for a militant Islamic group in Somalia.
Earlier this month,  Hamzah Kahn, 19, of suburban Chicago, pleaded guilty to one count of providing material support to a terrorist organization. He was arrested at O’Hare International Airport as he and his 17-year-old sister and 15-year-old brother attempted to board a flight with the ultimate destination of Syria. The younger siblings have not been charged.
Zarine Khan, the defendant’s mother, said her son had been brainwashed by social media recruitment. In an anguished televised statement, she addressed Islamic State recruiters directly: “Leave our children alone.”

Thursday, January 22, 2015

The Muslim Next Door

Language defines a country. It delineates the “ethos” of an entire civilization. It creates the energy of communities and their citizens. Language expresses emotions, songs and understanding.

Language also causes separation, confusion, suffering and war. Different languages constitute different ethos, and how people and countries look at the world. Different languages create different understandings.

As discovered via the Muslim invasion of Europe, one different language and ethos clashes with all Europeans. Whether you see Muslims living in the United Kingdom with English or Muslims living in France with French—you see fear, no-go zones, separation, riots and terror. All of it brought about by Muslims from the desert sands of the Middle East settling into the Western lands of green wilderness. 

Notice you never see Americans or Europeans immigrating to the land of Islam. Such an action leads to loss of individual freedom, honor killings, loss of women’s rights and loss of religious rights. Multiculturalism cannot exist in Islamic-dominated lands. 

As with this month’s horrific terror attacks in Paris and elsewhere, Islam marches across the globe on a mission of conquest like nothing seen since Hitler’s invasion of Europe and North Africa. Hitler used intimidation and weapons. Muslims use intimidation and terror via bullets and C-4 plastic.

Yet, Europeans continue their “let’s be nice” approach to Islam. Even after the terror in Paris, France—Germany’s Angela Merkel placated Muslims with such words as, “Islam belongs to Germany.” If you asked any German on the street, you would hear, “Muslims are killing our country.” In America after 9/11, Bush said, “Islam is a religion of peace.” On the streets, “Religion of peace my rear end…they just killed 3,000 people in the New York Trade Towers.”

In reality, those leaders who don’t live in Muslim communities—don’t feel the pain, the fracturing, destruction of their schools, loss of language, the honor killings, the FGM, the rapes or the loss of their countrymen’s ethos. 

In reality, Muslims bring their barbaric behavior to First World countries: “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as His absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. 

“But the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.” 

That’s the reality of what America and Western countries face in the 21st century. It’s a mad-dog religion bent on destroying everyone else as well as itself in the ultimate showdown of war.

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859): “I studied the Qur’an a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Mohammad. So far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.”

Today in America, with seven million Muslims invading our shores, our communities feel the stress of language consequences in places like Eden Prairie, Minnesota. From November 26, 2014, USA Today by Greg Toppo “Anger, resentment over school diversity.” Our US Congress sent tens of thousands of Somalia Muslims to the Minneapolis area. In 1998, Eden Prairie enjoyed a full American community. Since that time, Muslims chased out Americans, overwhelmed the schools and destroyed the coherence of the community. Since they lack any usable skills, most subsist on American taxpayer welfare.

Last fall, the superintendent of the school system in Prairie and much of the staff quit in exasperation. As you know, nearly 100,000 Somali Muslims now operate in the Minneapolis area where rapes, crimes, drug trafficking, brutality, shoplifting and worse blacken the area.

Hyper-multiculturalism cannot and will not succeed in America. It’s already busting us up in Ferguson, Missouri as well as Detroit, Chicago, Miami and Los Angeles.

Here in my own city of Denver, Colorado, our kids face 172 different languages in their classrooms. It’s a nightmare for American kids and the immigrants. Every American faces these kinds traumatic conditions bestowed up on us by our U.S. Congressional members. But of course, they can’t “see” it or “feel” it as their kids attend private schools.

Journalist Eliana Benedor said, “To the great detriment of countries as separate entities, those leaders, in the name of globalization, are subtly removing national identities, traditions, mores and, what is worse, they are lethally endangering the future of their countries. When all is said and done the truth is, however, that the Paris march turned to be a manipulative step to assuage the masses, under the banner of the so-called “unity.” 

“While condemning the attacks, even President Hollande and his Prime Minister Manuel Valls, rejected that the murderous massacres by Islamists Jihadists have anything to do with Islam.” 

What that means: we must not be confused that the terrorists espoused anything to do with Islam. But in fact, Islam creates every terror attack in the world today.
It illustrates “cognitive dissonance” or the “intellectual denial of reality.”

Western Islamic scholars show that 60 percent of the Koran points to violence and terror to subjugate all non-believers.

Thus, language drives terrorists and language drives ethos and language drives Muslims to war against Western thought and freedom.

Benador added, “On their part, Muslim terrorists proudly show their allegiance to the Koran as the source for their inspiration. It is their prophet who instructs them, unambiguously, what to do, to whom, when, where and how. Western politicians may want to whitewash Islam but their efforts cannot erase the facts and the abundant videos and messages on the internet, profusely distributed, left as testimony of their deeds.” 

The sad fact remains that Sweden, Belgium, Norway, Holland, as well as France, England and Germany opened their arms to Muslims. They pay an extraordinary price today and more later as their countries and languages fracture. 

“Now, they are paying a very heavy price: Hundreds of no-go zones throughout Europe, rapes, honor killings, constant threats to their local communities, crimes, and more is happening under the watchful eyes and complicity of their “cognitive dissonant” governments,” said Benedor.

If we kill our language, we kill our country. Muslims continue their quest to accomplish that feat. We face the “Arabic language” eroding our country if we fail to stop Muslim immigration onto our shores. 

The warlord Mohammed continues his carnage into the 21st century with the hands of 1.5 billion of his followers. 

If we fail to stop mass immigration, France’s nightmare becomes our future.
I hope this series drives you to action for your kids. - 

KIng To Wright

"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.' ... I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. ... And if America is to be a great nation this must become true." --Martin Luther King Jr., August 28, 1963

Today, the once-noble Democratic Party of MLK's era has devolved into a propaganda machine fueled by hate and division, which has turned the wisdom of this iconic sovereign's most quoted remark upside down. It's as if King had said, "I have a dream that my children will one day be judged by the color of their skin, not the content of their character."

To keep you fully informed, your Patriot team follows Sun Tzu's maxim from "The Art of War": "Know your enemy." Thus, we review the whole spectrum of news, policy and opinion, including notable daily dispatches from organizations like the Communist Party USA and other leftist groups, in order to better engage the adversaries of Liberty.


To that end, I attended this year's MLK "Unity Prayer Breakfast," ostensibly in honor of Martin Luther King, featuring keynote speaker Jeremiah "GD America" Wright. My objective was to determine if Wright was still wrong.

As you recall, Wright was the charismatic "pastor" to Barack Obama, who, for two decades prior to 2008, indoctrinated his disciple with the black supremacist doctrines of hate and the Marxist "social gospel." Wright married Barack and Michelle, baptized their children and later was identified by Obama in his biography as his primary "father figure."

But in 2008, as Obama was seeking to dupe American voters and slide into the White House, Wright disappeared from the political grid after videos of his hate-filled "US-KKK-A" racist rhetoric hit YouTube. Who can forget some of his more colorful protests: "'God Bless America.' No, no, no, G-d d--m America -- that's in the Bible -- for killing innocent people. G-d d--m America for treating our citizens as less than human. G-d d--m America for as long as she acts like she is god and she is supreme."

Shortly after those videos surfaced, Obama tried to distance himself from decades under Wright's rhetoric, claiming in 2008, "I am outraged by the comments that were made. His comments were not only divisive and destructive; I believe they end up giving comfort to those who prey on hate... They offend me. They rightly offend all Americans. And they should be denounced."

Of course, Obama, himself a master of the "the BIG Lie," was elected and re-elected on "divisive and destructive" rhetoric preying on hate -- and indeed, he learned from a master!

Now that Obama has completed his last election -- the 2014 midterm in which his policies were, as he claimed, "on the ballot, every single one of them," all of which were resoundingly defeated -- Jeremiah Wright has come out of exile.

Needless to say, Wright's message was NOT about "unity."

Front and center at this event was the table of honor reserved for the "peace-loving" Nation of Islam leaders, and, according to those introducing Wright, he was selected to "raise holy hell" and "set us ablaze." But, we were reminded, "Our speaker has often been misquoted and misunderstood ... as most voices for God are."

Really?

Wright began by ingratiating himself to his audience for a few minutes -- before dragging them down to hell. He declared that we should all be thankful for Obama's two inaugurals, saying, "Praise God and Party, but the race ain't over yet." It took him almost five minutes before singling out conservative white folks as "racist," suggesting that among those looking down on black folks today are "the countless bodies of estranged fruit hung up in the trees and left hanging in a country that is taught to hate the color of their skin. ... Black men, women and children lynched, watching to see if we understand that the Tea Party ain't nothing but a 2.0 upgrade of a lynch mob!"

Sitting next to me at Wright's hatefest was my colleague, Tennessee Tea Party principal Mark West, and of course he and I were in the one-percent minority at this venue. The grassroots Tea Party movement is about Liberty for all Americans, as was Martin King's dream, but Wright would have none of that.

We believe that Liberty is colorblind, but asserting individual rights and responsibilities is an affront to Wright and other race-baiters, including Obama's chief race relations counselor, Al Sharpton, and Attorney General Eric Holder.

Wright wasted no time heating up Obama's latest race-bait stew: "Michael Brown was left rotting in the streets of Ferguson, Missouri, in the hot August sun like road kill ... while his murderer walks free because the prosecutor orchestrated a verdict not to indict. ... Eric Garner ... choked to death in front of a video camera while his murderers are set free by bigoted bozos."

And so Wright continued -- ad nauseum.

In addition to my Tea Party colleague, there were three other people at our table, black folks, who were genuinely devoted to "unity in Christ" as clearly distinguishable from Wright's message of racial disunity. One of them had an interesting observation: "If one was to examine the civil rights movement of the Sixties and compare it to the social justice movements of today, you would find one glaring difference.

MLK's success was partly due to thousands of college students and young people actively engaged and empowered by the message and practice of non-violence. But young people are not as engaged in the 'social justice' movements of the Al Sharptons and the Jeremiah Wrights because we are several generations removed from the racism and discrimination that was experienced by blacks prior to the civil rights movement. The next generation has no actual point of reference for such racism. We have enjoyed the fruit of King's labor. Thus, the Baby Boomers of the civil rights movement endeavor to instill their hate and bitterness into the current generation by fomenting social unrest over incidents like Brown and Garner. When those race baiters are dead and gone, then we might be truly 'free at last.'"

At Martin King's funeral, one Bible passage, Matthew 5:9, summed up his life's mission: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God."

But Obama and his cadres of race-baiters are anything but peacemakers. They have betrayed King's legacy, turning his dream into a nightmare for millions of black men, women and children now enslaved on urban poverty plantations by five decades of failed "Great Society" economic and social policies.

Anti Jihadi Website Taken down

Anti-free speech thugs are at it again. My website, Atlas Shrugs (PamelaGeller.com), was taken down by a massive DDoS attack last Thursday, and as of this writing on Sunday afternoon, the attack is still metastasizing. This attack is unprecedented in its size and scope. Jihadis and their leftist errand boys are so desperate to silence me and my message that they have devoted tremendous resources to taking down my site, which is devoted to honest news reporting about jihad activity.

Leftists and Islamic supremacists do this on all fronts. On Saturday, I organized a rally against an anti-free speech Islamic conference, and the leftists were in lockstep, goosestep, with the Islamic supremacists – as the media coverage from leftist outlets demonstrated.

My site host, Media Temple, said they couldn’t cope with the attack against my site. They had never in their history seen anything like it. The DDoS attack didn’t just take down my site. It also took down Media Temple and threatened all of their clients, and even attacked the servers that Media Temple uses at Net Data Center, a service provider that promises “uninterrupted operations.” Net Data Center could not handle the massive traffic that the attackers were sending to my site to take it down, and finally had to pull the plug on Atlas Shrugs.

The timing was noteworthy. Our ads calling attention to Islamic Jew-hatred in San Francisco have gotten an immense amount of national and international press. And above all, our free speech rally last Saturday to counter the “Stand with the Prophet” anti-free speech conference in Garland, Texas, got the foes of freedom riled.

Leaders of the Muslim community in America held their “Stand with the Prophet” conference in Garland, in support of Muhammad and the restriction of “Islamophobic” speech – working for the same goal as that which was held by those who killed 12 people at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris last week: the punishment of criticism of Islam and Muhammad, including even examinations of the motives and goals of terrorists.

The event featured: 

John Esposito, head of the Saudi-funded Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown; and 

Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and close friend of the mastermind of that bombing, the “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel Rahman. 

Saturday’s “Stand with the Prophet” event sought to combat “Islamophobes in America” – including me. This is in line with Islamic supremacist groups’ longstanding objective of defaming, smearing and marginalizing anyone who opposes the jihad agenda. They said they wanted to defend Muhammad – which means to silence those who notice that defenders of Muhammad just murdered 16 people in Paris and tens of thousands worldwide since 9/11.

Nevertheless, the superintendent of schools allowed this anti-American group to hold this conference agitating for an abridgment of the First Amendment – despite the mass slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo staff for violating the draconian Shariah blasphemy laws, mandating death for criticism of Islam. The Islamic law restricting free speech has no place in the American public sphere. It is anathema to the principles upon which this great nation was established.

But we were unbowed. Saturday in Garland, Texas, thousands of freedom-loving Americans took a stand for the freedom of speech. Block after block, row after row, Texan after Texan, American after American, said no to the restrictions against free speech as mandated under Islamic law (Shariah).

The rally was an enormous success. Thousands of Americans joined us in Garland, Texas, to oppose the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the earth, Islamic law (Shariah). They demonstrated their indomitable commitment to freedom. We will never give in, and never submit, and never be subjugated.

The media coverage of our rally was vicious, ugly and dishonest. It’s extraordinary in the wake of the Paris jihad attack, where journalists were mercilessly slaughtered in cold blood, that journalists are covering and advancing the most extreme and brutal ideology on the face of the earth. The jihadists screamed in the streets (while making a Nazi salute, by the way), “We have avenged the prophet.” 

This conference was the same kind of initiative: It was called “Stand with the Prophet.” And what did the media call it? A “peace conference.” One headline blared, “Muslims group gathers for peace, faces threats, protest.” And the news story features only smiling young women wearing hijabs.

This coverage, the “Stand with the Prophet” conference and the attack on my site are all part of the same anti-free speech initiative. The Islamic supremacists are out for blood, determined to criminalize criticism of Islam (and opposition to jihad terror) under the guise of fighting against “Islamophobia” and “hate speech.” The media cover for them. And on the eve of their “Stand with the Prophet” event, their fellow foes of free speech took my site down.

My website reaches close to 100,000 readers a day. No wonder they want so very much to take it down and keep it down. Our rally, like my website, stood for the freedom of speech against all attempts, violent and stealthy, to impose Islamic blasphemy laws on Americans and stifle criticism of Muhammad and Islam. As Muhammad’s followers kill more and more people, we need critics of him more than ever – and free people need to stand up against these underhanded attempts to stifle all criticism of Islam, including honest investigations of how jihadists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify Jew-hatred, violence, supremacism and oppression.

The foes of free speech never give up. And neither should its defenders. As of this writing, the DDoS attack against my website continues, and there is no end in sight. I am working furiously to move the site and get back online. The costs associated with the move, the server, and the IT expertise are staggering. You can rest assured that I’ll be back online – with a righteous vengeance.

We need to get the message out and cover the news the media won’t cover – especially now when the jihad is raging. I need your help. If you believe that Atlas Shrugs must survive

Saturday, January 17, 2015

Acid Attacks---A Face for a Face?

A file photo of a protest by acid attack survivors. Acid violence claimed 80 victims in 2010, 106 each in 2011 and 2012, 122 in 2013 and 130—the most ever for a single year—up to November 2014, says ASF India. Photo: HT It’s rare to see women dancing on the lawns of the Supreme Court of India. But on that sultry day of 18 July 2013, a group of women broke into a spontaneous dance after the nation’s top court finally acknowledged their suffering as victims of acid attacks. They were celebrating the court’s decision to impose restrictions on the sale of acid and provide compensation to victims. The group was cheering the fact that the nation’s highest court had in effect told them: No one should have to go through this pain again. Newspaper headlines in India termed the judgement historic. But history was merely repeating itself. Nearly four years ago and about 700km away in Islamabad, similar enthusiasm had greeted a court order mandating stricter scrutiny of acid sales. Both the Pakistani and Indian Supreme Courts had been moved by acid attack survivors who sought justice: Naila Farhat in Pakistan and Laxmi (who uses only one name) in India. In many ways, the protracted legal narrative of Laxmi’s case— 19 orders passed by 15 different judges—exemplifies the sheer apathy of successive governments for the plight and gravity of acid attacks. Filed by attorney Aparna Bhat in 2006, Laxmi’s case is now in its ninth year of litigation, and a final order is still awaited on free treatment of acid attack survivors in government and private hospitals. As state governments sought adjournments and time to file documents, the Supreme Court passed an order directing them to regulate acid sales and put in place rules under the Poisons Act that will license and regulate over-the-counter sale (http://mintne.ws/1rxJesV). “The order came after much resistance,” says Bhat. “Even now sub-divisional magistrates (SDMs) are not doing their job in monitoring the sale of acid, and so, attacks continue.” Until 2013, acid attacks were clubbed in a general category of offences that caused “grievous harm”. The Criminal Amendment Act of 2013, passed in the aftermath of recommendations made by the Justice J.S. Verma commission following the gang-rape and murder of a 23-year-old physiotherapy student in December 2012, finally recognised acid violence as a separate offence that now carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment and a fine. “Acid violence is a horrendous crime and once it is committed there is no going back for the victim,” says Leila Seth, former chief justice of Himachal Pradesh and one of three members of the Verma commission (http://mintne.ws/1BBIkvQ). “There is not enough focus on prevention. Are logs being maintained? Are SDMs monitoring the sale of acid which continues to be easily available?” she asks. A South Asian problem Acid violence is a problem not unique to India, but one that haunts south Asia with a “significant number of attacks… in South and Southeast Asian countries”, notes a report on acid attacks by the Avon Global Center for Women and Justice at Cornell University Law School in the US. Pakistan amended its laws in 2011, and acid attacks now carry a maximum punishment of life imprisonment and a fine of one million rupees. But Bangladesh had already shown the way forward. In 2002, the country passed two separate laws, one that dealt with punishment and another to regulate the sale of acid in the open market. The first makes particularly heinous acid attacks punishable by death. The second requires purchasers of acid to procure a license. By some accounts, the two laws have succeeded in bringing down acid violence by 80%. “In 2007 when we began our campaign, people did not think acid attacks were widespread and were surprised by its prevalence and horrified to see the impact,” says Valerie Khan, chairperson of Pakistan’s Acid Survivors Foundation (ASF). “We campaigned and communicated with local communities and with attack survivors, addressing them directly and getting survivors to lead these campaigns to build momentum.” In Bangladesh, the year 2002 witnessed an unprecedented increase in the number of acid attacks, resulting in nearly 500 victims. In 1999, this figure had been 159. Women’s rights organisations got together to start a dialogue. “We advocated with the government, but, more importantly, we built a demand from the grassroots,” says Kashfia Feroz of ActionAid, an organization that works towards eliminating poverty and has a 250-member strong network of acid attack survivors. “There was engagement at the local level. We held multiple workshops and seminars and developed advocacy strategies. After this we proceeded to negotiate with the government.” It helps that “Bangladeshi society is more sensitive towards women’s rights because women are strong economic players in the country,” says Sanjay Bhardwaj, an assistant professor for South Asian Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi. Significantly, the 2014 Global Gender Gap index—which maps relative gaps between women and men across four key areas of health, education, economy and politics—ranks Bangladesh at 68 out of 142 nations even as India figures at 114. “Bangladesh is a smaller country with a much larger NGO movement,” says noted feminist Kamla Bhasin. “The largest NGO there has 1.15 lakh employees. The largest in India has about 400. Bangladesh was able to fight acid attacks because the issue was taken up by some of the finest NGOs in the country.” Indian apathy By recognizing acid attacks as a heinous crime, countries such as Bangladesh and Pakistan have been able to shake off a degree of insouciance earlier associated with the offence. It has signalled an attitudinal shift for survivors and offenders alike. “Acid attack incidents decreased approximately 15-20% per year between 2002 and 2009,” says Elizabeth Brundige, assistant clinical professor of law and executive director, Avon Global Center for Women and Justice. The year 2013 saw 69 such attacks which reflects “the important impact of Bangladesh’s laws criminalizing acid violence and controlling its sale and distribution”, she says. “There was serious involvement of the government through stringent regulation, control on sale of acid and fast-track prosecution and punishment,” says Rahul Varma, national director and chief executive of ASF India. By his estimation, Bangladesh has brought down its incidence of acid violence by 80%. But in India, the rise in the number of acid attacks seems to suggest a lack of political will to combat it. ASF India says acid violence claimed 80 victims in 2010, 106 each in 2011 and 2012, 122 in 2013 and 130—the most ever for a single year—up to November 2014. Even by the home ministry’s own admission, there were 98 incidents of acid violence against women in 2011, 101 in 2012 and 80 in 2013. Activists say the number is higher since it does not take into account attacks that go unreported for fear of reprisals or attacks against men—nearly 35% of all attacks(http://mintne.ws/1xz4HD0). “Unless there is a particularly horrific incident and strong public outrage that threatens mainstream political parties, parties do not really make a noise,” says Brinda Karat, member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) politburo. “An acid attack is still seen as an individual issue. It is not seen as an erosion of democracy and erosion of democratic spaces for women. It is not an issue which is intrinsic to our political platforms.” Not true, says Maneka Gandhi, minister for women and child development: “Acid attacks are taken very seriously.” Acknowledging that the “issue is of sale of acid”, she adds, “Acid sale should be checked thoroughly.” Yet, despite the 2013 Supreme Court order, acid continues to be sold over the counter with no questions asked. A Mint investigation, part of this series on acid attacks, shows that just one week after a woman doctor was attacked, acid continued to be sold with almost no restrictions in most Delhi markets (http://mintne.ws/1I2wVar). The underlying factor that determines failure or success of a law, is its implementation. “We continue to engage with police personnel, medical professionals and lawyers—all stakeholders in the law,” says Zainad Qaiserani of ASF Pakistan. The effort is not to lose sight of lives at stake and the difference that a sensitized state machinery can make to a survivor, she says. In Pakistan, the rate of prosecution—cases reaching trial stage—has increased to 55% in 2013 compared with only 35% in 2011. The conviction rate has also had a relative increase, say activists. Responding to the 23 December acid attack on a woman doctor in Delhi, the ministry of home affairs (MHA) seems to have woken up to the gravity of the problem—18 months after the Supreme Court order. In a press release dated 24 December, MHA said it would work out a system of cashless treatment for acid survivors. This expense, it elaborated, would be borne by a Central Victim Compensation Fund to be set up by MHA. “A detailed plan for creating a full-fledged scheme has to be prepared,” said a senior MHA official on condition of anonymity. The press release also mentions creating a category of “heinous crimes”, which will include all offences that attract a maximum punishment of life imprisonment or death “suitable amendments in the criminal procedure code will be made for time-bound investigation and trial”. With the passage of less than a month, it appears that the MHA has begun the long-drawn process that will materialize in the promised changes. The protracted process of drafting concept notes, plans and multiple consultations is underway. But for those who continue to become victims of acid violence—one every three days in this country—it could already be too late.