Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Take the Quiz?



Q.1
When did the Universal Declaration of Human Rights come about and why?

Q.2
This photo, which made headlines, was taken during a marathon in Boston, USA, in 1967. Why did the man in the suit jump in here?
B20 Quiz Dec2014 APIMAGE 400x227

Q.3
What is substantive equality?

Q.4
CEDAW, commonly referred to as the women’s bill of rights, is the second most ratified UN human rights convention after the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Q.5
Which women’s rights activist said this?
quote beijing20 human rights en


Why are Child Rape Victims Imprisoned?

A 13-year-old runaway was gang raped by 10 men for several hours in a Texas apartment last year. When she was rescued, authorities took her to a hospital where she was given a rape kit, which was used along with her account to quickly find two of her assailants, who were charged with felony sexual assault of a child.
Now consider the story of another 13-year-old girl, who was sold by a pimp to dozens of men throughout Washington, D.C. She experienced the same pain, fear, trauma, and abuse as the first child. But when an undercover officer, posing as a John, encountered her in a hotel room, she was arrested for prostitution and sent to juvenile jail. The men who bought her (or, more correctly, raped her) walked away free.
That our society labels one of these girls a criminal and the other a victim is unjust. Ultimately, both were sent to treatment centers, but the second had the added trauma of going through the penal system and carrying an arrest record. This difference is based in a deeply rooted misunderstanding that the second girl made “a choice” because she was paid. Since she has a pimp, she is no longer considered a victim of statutory rape and sexual abuse. This misguided notion leads police to arrest more than 1,000 victimized children a year for prostitution – a crime they aren’t even capable of committing. Federal law mandates that minors cannot willingly be involved in prostitution, but this rule isn’t uniformly enforced. Local and state jurisdictions must go a step further to ensure these children aren’t treated as criminals.
Only 12 states have “Safe Harbor” laws that prohibit the arrest of children for prostitution-related crimes. This week, Washington D.C. joined the group, passing the Sex Trafficking of Minors Prevention Act. The D.C. law has an added provision mandating that the children are connected to emergency and long-term services, such as housing, through organizations like mine, FAIR Girls. But while these children can’t be arrested for prostitution, many are instead jailed for truancy, being a runaway and other minor violations. The majority of FAIR Girls’s 45 minor clients (we have 125 clients total, aged 11 to 24) last year were arrested for such crimes. Without effective training for law enforcement and a comprehensive trafficking response model, the vast majority of child victims are simply locked up anyway. When they are released from jail, they often go further underground where they are exploited by traffickers again.
Opponents of Safe Harbor laws fear prosecutors and law enforcement will lose their power to persuade children to testify in court against their traffickers. But the truth is that children who are given quality services are more likely to give honest testimony than those who are forced under threat of arrest. To truly work, Safe Harbor laws must include funding to make sure those services are available. In Washington D.C., FAIR Girls is pushing for the District to fund a mobile trafficking response team that can quickly provide trained professionals and services whenever police encounter a potential child trafficking situation. The team would connect the child with long-term housing, intensive counseling, educational support, mentoring, and safety planning, which FAIR Girls currently provides with funding from the federal Office of Victims of Crime, private foundations and individual donors. At about $125 a day, those services cost 50 percent less than the average price of keeping a child incarcerated.
On average, our clients were first trafficked at 12 to 14 years old. Ninety percent are American citizens, and all have experienced sexual abuse or domestic violence prior to being trafficked. Traffickers target the vulnerable to exploit their weaknesses.  They target runaways and homeless youth, mainly girls, by offering them a safe place to sleep or pretending to be their boyfriends. These children are victims, and it is our responsibility to care for them. It is time that the law enforcement and criminal justice systems treat child sex trafficking like what it really is – organized rape for profit.

Saturday, December 27, 2014

rarely Do I Agree With Allen West...But

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES FROM ALLEN.

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Ted Cruz a/k/a Deep Shiite

Ted Cruz: Obama's New Cuba Policy 'Will Be Remembered as a Tragic Mistake'

The junior senator from Texas, whose father emigrated from Cuba, said Wednesday that Obama's announcement is seriously misguided.

(Erich Schlegel/Getty Images)
December 17, 2014  Hours after his Senate colleague and fellow Cuban-American Marco Rubio criticized President Obama's change in U.S. policy on Cuba, Ted Cruz broke his silence on the news with a bang, calling the decision "a tragic mistake."
The Republican senator from Texas told Fox News' Neil Cavuto on Wednesday afternoon that because of the American embargo and diplomatic freeze-out, Cuba had been "gasping for air." Now, though, Obama's policy shift would have devastating effects.
"Just like the administration did with Iran, right when the [Iranian] administration was feeling the maximum pain, [Obama] throws them an economic lifeline and continues the brutal repression and dictatorship of the Castro brothers," said Cruz, whose father emigrated from Cuba in 1957, four years before the U.S. imposed a strict trade embargo on the country.
When Cavuto pointed out that more than five decades of the same policy hadn't been very effective, Cruz demurred. "What it has wrought is limiting the impact and harm of Cuba," he said.
Cruz also criticized the president's foreign policy strategy as a whole, slamming what he called Obama's inability to discern the "difference between our friends and our enemies."
"This president believes appeasement works," he said. "When it comes to dealing with tyrants and bullies, whether it is [Russian President Vladimir] Putin, whether it is Iran, or whether it is the Castros in Cuba, he believes that a position of weakness is how we should negotiate, and that doesn't work."
Cruz, a likely 2016 candidate, made sure to contrast the "Obama-Clinton-Kerry foreign policy," as he called it—a new spin on his usual "Obama-Clinton" line—with his own doctrine of "peace through strength." And in another reminder of his seemingly inevitable run for the presidency, Cruz told Cavuto that in 2016, Republicans shouldn't nominate another moderate candidate—presumably like former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who announced Tuesday that he is seriously considering a White House bid.
"What we're doing isn't working," Cruz said. "If we nominate another candidate in the mold of a Bob Dole or John McCain or Mitt Romney—and let me be clear, all three of them are good, honorable, principled men—but it isn't working. The same voters who stayed home in '08 and '12 will stay overwhelmingly in '16, and Hillary Clinton is the next president. And that will do irreparable damage to the country."
As if the news of a thaw in U.S. relations with Cuba wasn't worrisome enough for Republicans.

Global Praise Except at Home

US-Cuba relations: Global praise for normalisation of ties

People cheer for the "Cuban Five" while holding a poster of the five Cuban intelligent agents, in Havana 17 December 2014.Cubans celebrated the release of three high-profile prisoners who were serving sentences for espionage
World leaders have welcomed a historic move by the US to end more than 50 years of hostility towards Cuba and restore diplomatic relations.
Leaders in Latin America and Europe praised the "courage" of US President Barack Obama and his Cuban counterpart.
Pope Francis, who played a central role in bringing the rivals together, also congratulated both men.
They have agreed a number of measures to improve ties, including the release of prisoners on both sides. 
Announcing the move, President Obama said the "rigid and outdated policy" of isolating Cuba had clearly failed and that it was time for a new approach.
'Beginning of the end'
Leading the praise, Pope Francis sent "warm congratulations" to Mr Obama and Cuban President Raul Castro for overcoming "the difficulties which have marked their recent history".
The announcement followed more than a year of secret talks in Canada and at the Vatican, directly involving the pontiff.
The European Union, which is in the process of normalising ties with Cuba, described the move as a "historical turning point", while leaders meeting at a Latin America summit in Argentina broke into applause at the news.
Alan Gross celebrates onboard a government plane headed back to the US with his wife, Judy Gross in this 17 December 2014 White House handout photoUS national Alan Gross celebrates after his release from five years of imprisonment in Cuba
Anti-Castro activists protest in Little Havana in Miami, Florida 17 December 2014. The rapprochement was not received well by some exiled Cubans living in the US state of Florida 
Cuban President Raul Castro (L) embraces Gerardo Hernandez after he and two other Cuban intelligence agents arrived in Havana in this 17 December 2014 Cuban TV aired footage of President Castro (L) greeting one of the intelligence agents released from the US
Chilean Foreign Minister Heraldo Munoz hailed it as "the beginning of the end of the Cold War in the Americas".
Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro, whose predecessor Hugo Chavez was a close ally of Fidel Castro, said it was a "moral victory" and "victory for Fidel".
Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said increased US engagement in Cuba in the future should "encourage real and lasting reforms for the Cuban people".
"And the other nations of the Americas should join us in this effort," she added.
Grey line
Analysis: Julia Sweig, director for Latin America Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations 
US President Barack Obama's re-election in 2012 and garnering of a sizable number of Cuban voters in Florida helped push the lifting of historic restrictions against Cuba.
It also increased the momentum to free US aid worker Alan Gross, following five years in a Cuban prison.
The added negotiations for the release of three Cubans in exchange for one US intelligence operative were the "most delicate", involving the highest levels of both governments, including Mr Obama and Cuba's Raul Castro.
But, as both countries now move towards regulatory efforts to liberalise trade and travel among them, negotiations will shift to lower level agencies.
Mr Obama's aim in using his executive authority to open up decades-long boundaries with Cuba is in "laying scaffolding" for longer-term political gains.
As more Americans travel to and trade with Cuba, pressure on Congress will mount to fully nullify the legally codified embargo. But I think we're a while away from that.
Grey line
The Canadian prime minister, Stephen Harper, whose country never broke off ties with Cuba, also welcomed what he called the "overdue development".
But the move was not applauded elsewhere, with some exiled Cubans in Florida reacting with anger and dismay and some Republicans in the US criticising the decision.
A classic American car passes by a stall selling onions in Havana, Cuba, on 17 December 2014.The Cuban government blames the US embargo for economic hardship on the island
"It is a betrayal. The talks are only going to benefit Cuba," Carlos Munoz Fontanil said at a protest in Miami's Calle Ocho.
As part of the deal, US contractor Alan Gross, 65, was released from Cuban prison in return for three Cubans held in the US. President Obama said the US was looking to open an embassy in Havana in the coming months.
Meanwhile, Mr Castro has urged the US to ends its trade embargo, which has been in place since the Cuba revolution led to Communism in the early 1960s.

US and Cuba

54 years
since trade embargo imposed
$1.1 trillion
cost to Cuban economy
  • Cost to US economy  $1.2bn a year
  • US presidents since 1960: 11
  • Cuban presidents since 1960: 3
GETTY
But power to lift the embargo, which Mr Castro says has caused "enormous human and economic damage", lies with the US Congress, and correspondents say many Republicans are still deeply opposed to this.
Officials said that Mr Obama and Mr Castro spoke by telephone on Tuesday for nearly an hour - the first presidential-level talks between the two nations since Cuba's 1959 revolution.
In exchange for Mr Gross, who was in poor health, and an unnamed American intelligence officer, Washington released three members of the so-called "Cuban Five" who were serving lengthy sentences for espionage.
Mr Gross's five-year imprisonment had undermined previous attempts to thaw diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Grey line
Key dates
1959: Fidel Castro and his guerrilla army defeat the US-backed Cuban regime of Fulgencio Batista
1960-1961: Cuba nationalises US businesses without compensation; US breaks off diplomatic relations and imposes a trade embargo in response
1961: Failed Bay of Pigs invasion by CIA-backed Cuban exiles
1962: Soviet Union deploys ballistic missiles to Cuba, prompting Cuban Missile Crisis 
2001: Five Cubans, dubbed the Cuban Five, are jailed in Miami for spying
2008: Raul Castro becomes Cuban president
2009: US citizen Alan Gross detained in Cuba accused of spying
Dec 2013: US President Barack Obama and Raul Castro shake hands at Nelson Mandela's funeral - the first such public gesture since 1959
17 December 2014: Alan Gross is released by Cuba

Sunday, December 14, 2014

RHousewives of Riyahd

The boulevards of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia's capital, are lined with office towers, American fast food chains, and super-sized shopping malls. But the modern façade can't obscure a deeply conservative Islamic country.
saudi women
Saudi women leave a shopping mall in Riyadh on November 7, 2013.
 GETTY IMAGES
The malls may sell mini skirts and sexy lingerie, but the female shoppers nearly all wear floor-length black gowns known as abayas, and niqabs that cover everything except their eyes. And - as is the norm in Saudi Arabia - the fast food restaurants are segregated. Men sit at the front; women and families sit in a partitioned area at the back, shielded from public view.
Saudi women are also banned from driving, and need a male relative's permission to work and travel overseas. For visitors from the West, it can be tough to digest.
But we went to Saudi Arabia to talk to Saudi women, and to find out what they think about their own society. We wanted to look behind the cliché that paints all Saudi women as veiled and therefore victimized. On a rare visit to the closed-off kingdom, we also wanted to know if there were any real signs of change.
(For more of Holly Williams' reporting from Saudi Arabia, tune in to "CBS This Morning" and "CBS Evening News" on Thursday.)
A few days after arriving in Riyadh, we visited the Starbucks near our hotel. We ordered our coffees and sat at a table outside in the sun. My producer, Erin Lyall, and I both wore head-to-toe black, and had covered our heads out of respect for local customs.
After a few moments a very apologetic staff member approached us and explained that, as women, we weren't allowed to sit at the front of the café.
"We don't have a problem," he said. "But if the religious police see you there could be trouble."
The religious police, employed by the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, are tasked with implementing Islamic Sharia Law in Saudi Arabia. They can punish unrelated men and women for "intermingling" in public areas, and they enforce the dress code that is imposed on Saudi women.
Fearful the religious police would blame Starbucks for allowing intermingling to take place on its terrace, the staff member directed us to the "family" section at the rear: indoors, with little natural light.
There, we bumped into two young Saudi women who complained to us vociferously.
"We hate this," said one, as she tapped her fingernails on the counter.
During nearly two weeks in Saudi Arabia we met many other Saudis who shared their frustration with the country's strict interpretation of Islamic law -- some of them reformers within the government. One member of the Shura Council, the body that advises Saudi Arabia's all-powerful King Abdullah, told us he wanted reform in "in every aspect of life."
Saudi Arabia is clearly changing. There are now more women than men graduating from university, and the government is encouraging them to join the workforce. We met countless professional Saudi women who - despite a legal system that treats them as less-than-full citizens - occupy powerful positions in government and private companies.
There are others in Saudi Arabia -- including women -- who don't necessarily want things to change.
One of them is Um Seif, a high school teacher whose husband has two wives. Polygamy is legal under Islamic law, and still widely practiced in Saudi Arabia.
"Foreign women outside Saudi Arabia have more freedom than we do," she told us. "But I don't want to be like them. From a young age we're taught that these are our customs, and we follow them."
Balancing those very different attitudes is the challenge for King Abdullah and his government. Nobody in Saudi Arabia doubts that change is happening, but many worry that if it occurs too quickly it will prompt a backlash from religious conservatives.